Comment Worthy Super Bowl Ads
Feb 7th 2010Bull MooseSuper Bowl & The TV
First off, I don’t know what was more lame, the Tebow ad or that anyone got upset over it. There was supposed to be a stance on abortion in there? OK. (I couldn’t find a video to embed, but it is available at the Focus on the Family website.
(UPDATE: Found it on YouTube.)
Was this ad a funny tweaking of environmental political correctness or a chilling vision of the future? You decide:
I think it’s the latter. At least Cheap Trick got a check out of it.
I like how Coke paid to use Simpsons IP, but not for Harry Shearer or Hank Azaria or any of the more expensive voice actors to voice the IP:
This ad was just obnoxious:
My daughter saw this ad and responded by trying to tear off her shirt. We had to have a little talk.
The only ad I laughed out loud at was this one:
That ad of course was a call back to this ad from the last time CBS had (and the Colts were in) the Super Bowl:
That one is kind of creepy in light of recent news about Letterman and women who get invited to his in-studio apartment…
This was my least favorite ad. Probably because it falsely implies that a French woman who would marry an infidel American would have a baby. Come on, let’s keep it realistic.
And I’m throwing this one in, because I’m pretty sure it would be my wife’s favorite. (She only got to watch half the game.)
2 Comments »
RDOwens on 08 Feb 2010 at 5:27 am #
Another year and I still can’t speak to the commercials. I watched the game, I did not see the commercials. I think I tune them out. Of course, I have no desire for them either since they are commercials, not programming.
Bull Moose on 08 Feb 2010 at 7:03 am #
While I always want to smack people who say, “I only watch the Super Bowl for the commercials,” I won’t deny that the commercials have become part of the Super Bowl experience every year.