Archive for May, 2010

Hypothetical

If Bill Clinton brings down Obama, would it be politically feasible for Hillary to be the ‘12 nomination?

I think probably not, even if she’d want to be in such an unwinnable slot. So that would leave, who? Biden?

Not that I think any of that would ever happen. Rahm Emanuel is being set up to be the next Obama associate to be thrown under the bus and we’ll all be told that we shouldn’t worry ourselves about it.

The only way I could see it going all the way to the top is if someone makes the mistake of trying to throw Bill Clinton under the bus, because he won’t stand for it. But I doubt anyone will be that dumb. Then again, I didn’t think anyone in the cabinet would be the second to fall for an easily avoided “gotcha” moment.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

No Comments »

SWING and a miss.

What’s the deal with Obama’s cabinet? You’d think Napolitano would have been ready for McCain’s question after Holder got burned on it.

What is she doing during her 6 hour work day? Napolitano, like Holder, is a  lawyer. That bill took me all of 10 minutes to read. That really should have been a softball that McCain was lobbing her.  Instead she whiffed in a manner that made her look ridiculous.

If I was Obama, I’d get them all together and say, “The next one of you jackasses that shoots his mouth off on something without taking 10 minutes to read what you’re criticizing is going to have to answer to Oprah.”  Of course, that would require leadership.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

1 Comment »

Latest Installment of Bull Moose Answers the Advice Column Questions

This installment comes from Slate’s “Since You Asked.” (H/T Althouse.)

Dear Cary,

I hope this letter finds you well and healing.

I am writing because I am feeling more and more estranged from my father in the last few years, and I would like to return to the loving, respectful relationship we had while I was growing up. I am an independent, socially liberal woman in my mid-20s, currently in graduate school. My father is a retired civil servant and veteran of the Vietnam War. I am sure part of our conflict is generational; he has always been nostalgic for the “good old days” when men wore hats and acted decently. I remind him that men in lynch mobs wore hats, and it didn’t make them any more decent. He, however, chooses to idealize the values of his childhood, and ignore the racism, sexism and ideological repression of postwar America.

He has always identified as a Republican or an Independent, but it was a socially liberal, small-government kind of republicanism. In the last few years he has exchanged his moderate views for right-wing conservatism. His sole source of information is Fox News and conservative radio shows, and he has espoused increasingly paranoid views of our country’s future and President Obama’s intentions. He actually thinks Obama may be a Muslim, a socialist/communist, and is actively destroying America while the left-wing media clings to political correctness and looks the other way. He watches Glenn Beck and thinks, Yes, this makes sense. He is becoming myopic, and I am ashamed to say, racist and ignorant.

This is not the man I grew up with. I think he fears a future he cannot control, and longs for a past that never existed. He is responding to this existential crisis with fear, anger and paranoia. I feel for his situation, but cannot respect the viewpoint it generates. We are at a point where we can barely speak about current events or politics without deeply offending one another. I feel I cannot reconcile myself to his beliefs, and I know it is profoundly changing our relationship. How can I help him embrace a progressive, inclusive future? How do I bring back rationality, sensitivity and temperance into our discussions?

Worried

Cary’s response was pretty pathetic and completely predictable. If you read the response and replace “Fox News” with “heroine” it pretty much makes sense. (Althouse liked it, though. Women and their feelings…)

Here is the correct response:

Dear Worried,

Seriously? “How can I help him embrace a progressive, inclusive future? How do I bring back rationality, sensitivity and temperance into our discussions?” Sweet baby Jesus, I can’t fathom what the problem is. I mean, who wouldn’t want a snotty graduate student walking into their house and lecturing them about what an ignorant racist they are?

You are an independent, socially liberal woman in my mid-20s, currently in graduate school? Translated into English that means you’ve never been out in the real world a day in your life, haven’t paid a cent of income tax, and in general you know shit about shit. It sounds like your old man, on the other hand, has seen a couple of things.  If something has his attention, maybe it’s worth thinking about.

First, I have to say that Fox News can be a healthy part of a complete information diet, and yes, it probably wouldn’t hurt the old man to flip around the dial or the internet a little bit to keep himself intellectually honest.  However, anyone who takes Slate seriously enough to actually write to their advice columnist probably isn’t really in a position to criticize anyone’s choice in media.

You say, “he actually thinks Obama may be a Muslim, a socialist/communist, and is actively destroying America while the left-wing media clings to political correctness and looks the other way.” If that’s so, it sounds like he’s batting about .400. However, I doubt that is what he’s actually thinking. I know your type. You hear someone saying something that doesn’t completely square with your secular-progressive world view and your “nuanced” mind shuts down, runs the first sentence heard through the Daily Kos/Olbermann decoder ring and spits out the proper, easily-identifiable “what the right thinks” catch phrases.

Let me frame this in a different way: Your dad likely thinks your political beliefs are as ignorant and dangerous as you think his are. Does he harangue you and write you to half-assed advice columnists about his terrible daughter? Does he try to control the TV you can watch and radio you can listen to?

What you should do is visit your dad and apologize for saying snotty shit like “men in lynch mobs wore hats, and it didn’t make them any more decent” and for saying ignorant shit like “ideological repression of postwar America.” Rather than focusing on the racism and sexism in the ’50’s try to identify what your dad cherishes about those days. Maybe you will get something out of it. If your dad is or was a decent man like you say, there must be something worthwhile there. And are you sure that he “longs for the past” or is he looking to the past as a guide to the future? You might also want to think hard about whether he’s really changed that much or whether you have.

Or just keep harping on him with your know-nothing self righteousness until he finally tells you to fuck off and cuts you out of the will. Whatever.

Lovingly,
Bull Moose

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

5 Comments »

Seattle (kinda) boycotts AZ? No kidding…

Monkey see:

The [San Francisco] Board of Supervisors today approved a resolution calling for a boycott of the state of Arizona…

Monkey do:

Seattle City Council approves Arizona boycott

Seattle is like the kid in high school that hung out with the popular crowd, but clearly wasn’t the one bringing the popularity.  Rather, he was there because he was the pathetic “yes man” who stroked the egos of the cool kids enough to be let into the group.  Sure, once in a great while he’d come up with ideas like banning plastic grocery bags, but mostly he just followed.  Seattle is the Potsie of America’s Enlightened Blue Archipelago.

It is worth noting that Seattle’s boycott does not include their red light camera contract. Once again ideals stop where money starts for the left (not that it doesn’t for the right, but the left is supposed to be above that, right?).

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

No Comments »

Kagan

Could Kagan be a stealth moderate? Those are some interesting finds at that link, but I’m not holding my breath. First, moderate SCOTUS nominees tend to turn into leftist SCOTUS Justices. Second, Obama knows her fairly well and must know what he’s getting. Right? Then again, Obama has not shown himself to be a spectacular judge of people.

However I will say that Kagan is head and shoulders above Obama’s other finalists in my view.  Sure, she was never a judge, but that might be a feature rather than a bug (see: William Rehnquist). I don’t understand why Kagan wasn’t nominated before Sotomayer.  Well, maybe I do. I’d theorize that it has to do with Obama’s obsession with being historical; first wise latina on the court and all of that. But if Kagan was put on the court in part  to try to win Kennedy, you’d think that would have been the priority.

I’m also getting a kick out of the gay-or-not-gay rumor mongering from the left.  I just assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that she is a lesbian. And because I’m one of those bigoted conservatives it didn’t make any difference to me either way, I’m just against her because she’s a woman (everything after the comma was a joke for those of you that are humor impaired). I was surprised to see this story yesterday.

In any case, it looks like the SCOTUS left wing line change is 2/3 done.  There’s just Ginsburg to replace before 2012.  (I’m hoping that Breyer tries to make it into a second Obama term and then… whoever… can replace him and break the perpetual 4-4-1 tie.)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

No Comments »