My hopes that the 2L as the “work you to death” year would be overblown have been laid to rest, at least for the fall semester.
My first impressions of the courses:
Bioethics:
This is going to be a lot more philosophy and a lot less law than I would have thought. The professor should be good, though, he has a Ph.D. in bioethics, a J.D. from our law school (first non-Ivy League or Stanford alum I’ve had). There are a lot of good issues to talk about – abortion, stem cells, end of life issues. Should be fun. There are three papers to write, though. Thankfully, two are “reflection” papers with no research required.
A lot of the students seem to have had Catholic ethics courses as undergrads and are now openly hostile to them (makes you wonder why they continued on to a Jesuit law school). There are also a couple lapsed Baptists, including one that describes himself as a “hardcore atheist.” At least he didn’t call himself a Secular Humanist.
Besides me, there are two others with biotech backgrounds, including an academic Ph.D. in molecular biology. Academic Ph.D.s are always so annoyingly arrogant. I fled to industry for a reason. I can almost guarantee we butt heads more than a couple times this semester.
Intellectual Property:
Someone finally figured out that the first course in IP should be a survey course, instead of reading cases that will just be re-read in the more advanced IP classes. There looks to be a lot of good material from historical perspective of the Constitutional basis for patents and copyright, as well as a general idea of what they are about.
The only downside about the reorganization of the class is that the professor isn’t sure what the exam will be like.
There is a lot of material to read in this class. Way more than any other 3-credit class I’ve taken.
The prof is a pretty amiable guy. In fact, he’s the guy I went to for class scheduling advice last spring.
Legal Writing II:
Another non-ivy prof (U. Washingotn)? Another female, American born, Asian for Legal Writing?
This one worked as a prosecutor for a long time, though, and seems pretty humorless. Great.
And she’s taking the “work you to death” seriously. There are two huge papers and three oral arguments. The first oral arguments are nest week already. I’m getting tired just thinking about this class.
At least this times it is three credits in one semester so actually worth the work unlike last year’s Legal Writing I.
Constitutional Law:
Me before class: “What are all these day students doing in this class?”
Prof after class starts: “I grade pretty liberally.”
Me: “Oooohhhh…”
Back to the Harvard professors. And despite his hippie look – long grey hair, and jeans in class – he doesn’t seem to have much love for Seattle, choosing to live in Tacoma instead, and more surprisingly hinted at being a bit of a constructionist.
Hey! I want to argue with the class, not have the prof argue my material!
And work? You bet. When a decision like Dred Scott runs about 150 pages, you can begin to see how that might take a toll on the clock.
I’ve been looking forward to this class since I was admitted. I hope it lives up to the hype.